Navigate
Use compact category hubs first, then jump to trust and support pages.
Sections
Tool Categories
Last updated: April 2026
Compare two file versions side by side with line numbers, add and remove highlights, scroll sync, and export-ready HTML output directly in the browser.
File Diff Viewer compares two local files side by side and highlights what changed at the line level. It is built for the everyday review job where you have two versions of a policy, article, CSV export, markdown note, or DOCX draft and need to see exactly what changed before you approve or send the revision.
The viewer keeps the comparison practical. Upload an original file and a new version, let the browser extract the text, and read the changes in a split layout with line numbers on both sides. Added lines stand out, removed lines are marked clearly, and changed lines show inline word differences when the lines still overlap enough to compare directly.
DOCX support is text-first. The tool extracts the document wording in the browser and compares that text output, not Word-specific styling, comments, or tracked-change metadata. For version review, this is usually the right tradeoff because the real question is what changed in the wording rather than whether a font or margin moved.
When you need to share the review result with someone else, you can export the side-by-side comparison as an HTML file. That makes it easier to send a readable record of what changed without asking the next person to upload the two files again.
Compare two TXT, MD, CSV, or DOCX files side by side with line numbers, add and remove highlights, scroll sync, and exportable HTML output.
Browse Power ToolsOriginal file: policy-v1.md and new file: policy-v2.md with a revised leave section, two added bullet points, and one removed paragraph.
A split diff view showing the removed paragraph in red on the left, the revised wording in green on the right, synced line numbers, and a top summary counting added, removed, and unchanged lines.
The comparison is based on extracted text lines. That makes it very useful for wording review, but it does not attempt to reproduce rich DOCX layout, spreadsheet formulas, or style-only formatting changes. If the real question is visual formatting, you still need a format-specific design or layout check.
Many review workflows stall because only one person has the original pair of files. Exporting the result as HTML gives you one portable artifact that another reviewer can open locally and read without rerunning the diff from scratch.